For Lao PDR, Official Development Assistance (ODA) is very important
mechanism to promote the potential of investment fund, technology, marketing,
management experiences, take part of job creation, increase of income level,
upgrade of country development level. Therefore, promotion and attraction of ODA
and FDI is become one of priority policy of party and government of Lao PDR.
Promotion of the ODA into Lao for development of important sectors; potential
sectors are essential necessary for current situation, especially for development of
energy sectors because this sector is an major partof country socio-economic
development; it is a necessary of living condition of the people, generate income
from export of surplus power from domestic use to neighboring country, creation
for income from job opportunity for workers. Together with those, it is also a factor
contribute to promote other sector development as well.
147 trang |
Chia sẻ: lylyngoc | Lượt xem: 3081 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Effective aid coordination in lao pdr: policy implications for power sector development, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
work
plans.
RTIM held in Nov 2007
SWG Review Report
shared and
recommendations
discussed May2007.
Man date and minimum
performance expectations
for each SWG decided and
roles in implementing CAP
confirmed by October 2007.
INGO and wider
Membership to SWG sis
promoted.
4SWG work plans
incorporating simple Joint
Monitoring Indicators
(that
AllSWGs prepare
Annual work
plans and budgets
(where agreed in
TORs).
All SWGs
oversee effective
sector dialog
that:
1.Builds
consensus around
clear priorities;
2.Aligns &
harmonizes DP
support around
these priorities
;and
3.Monitors
106
VD§
Goal Action GoL Lead
Agency
&
DP Focal Point
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
Lao FY
v) GoL identifies specific capacity
constraints to its leadership of the aid
effectiveness agenda at the macro levels
and decides with DPs on a program of
support to remedy this.
Allows measurement of their
Own progress) developed by
Nov 2007and progress
reported at RTIM 2007
VD and CAP translated in to
Lao and distributed to GoL
agencies through workshops
All SWGs meet their
own standards.
3.(VD
4)
DPs support
Leadership of GoL
and strengthen
GoL's capacity to
exercise leadership.
i) GoL prepares CDFs in key cross cutting
areas and sectors of NSEDP.
PACSA
WB,UN
[UNDP]
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs,
where
appropriate.
Transport,
Education and
Public Health in
process of
developing CDF.
4CDF (Transport,
Education, Health and
Agriculture) finalized by end
2008.
A further 2-3 CDF
Finalized by 2010.
1. Alignment: Donors base their overall support on partner countries' national development strategies,
institutions and procedures
DPs Align with the GoL's Strategies
1. (VD
5)
DP policies,
Activities and aid
flows are aligned
with GoL strategies
and plans.
1. Through the SWGs, DPs broadly align
And harmonize their assistance strategies
to sector strategies and the NSEDP;
ODA flows are aligned with the
prioritized investments contained in
sector strategies and PIPs with particular
attention to the over-and under-funded
sections of the PIP.
CPI,UN
[UNDP]
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs.
72% of ODA is
Recorded on
national budget
(ODA
Report2005).
Unfunded parts of the PIP
Reduced from X to Y
[note: data to be taken from
the Ownership sections].
By 2010 all DPs
Have broadly aligned
their assistance
strategies to the
NSEDP and sector
strategies.
85% of ODA is
recorded on national
budget (Global
target:85%).
107
VD§
Goal Action GoL Lead
Agency
&
DP Focal Point
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
GoL Strengthens Regulations and Procedures with support from DPs, which DPs Increasingly Use
2.(VD
8,9)
DPs do not create
structures for
implementing
ODA-funded
projects that are
parallel to GoL
structures.
i) GoL and DPs carry out a joint review of
ODA-funded implementation structures in
order to a) classify them according to the
agreed matrix (refer Definitions), and b)
summarise lessons learned in integrating
project implementation structures to date;
ii)SWGs build on lessons learned above to
guide progress towards integrating project
implementation functions within their
sector and monitor progress towards this.
DIC, MoFA
UN [UNDP]
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs.
66% of projects use
PMUs/PIUs in 2005
(OECD-DAC
survey).
MCTPC has no
PMUs/PIUs.
Education has made
progress in reducing
parallel project
structures.
Review of current
implementation structures
and lessons learned by end
2007.
All SWGs agree on guidance
for integrating project
implementation functions
within their sector by mid
2008.
No new parallel
implementation
structures created
after 2010, unless
endorsed by relevant
GoL agencies.
GoL strengthens development capacity with support from DPs
3.(VD
10,11)
DPs align their
technical
cooperation behind
GoL CDFs.
i) DPs provide technical cooperation and
other capacity building interventions in
alignment with GoL developed sector
CDFs.
CPI, PACSA,
WB
<10% of total
capacity building
interventions
aligned with CDFs
(only MCTPC).
For those sectors with CDF,
50% of new capacity
building interventions align
with CDFs by mid 2009.
50%oftotal
capacity
development
interventions aligned
with CDFs.
108
Strengthening Financial Management
VD§
Goal Action GoL Lead
Agency &
DP Focal Point
Baseline
2005/06 Lao FY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
4.(VD
6,8,12,
14)
GoL implements
reforms to
strengthen PFM to
enable DPs to
increasingly use
GoL financial
management
procedures and
systems for their
ODA.
Strengthening national PFM systems:
i) GoL and DPs jointly review and decide
on acceptable criteria for PFM
regulations and procedures;
ii) GoL strengthens budget execution by
implementing the budgeting
law/centralization of treasury; aligning
budget execution with plan; and
integrating ODA financing and other
revenues into the budget;
iii) GoL produces quarterly financial reports on
consolidated GoL expenditure, and makes
these compatible with GoL financial
statistics standards over time;
iv) GoL strengthens internal control
framework by establishing internal audit
functions and associated enforcement
mechanisms;
v) GoL strengthens the State Audit
Organization so that it can provide
independent audit opinions to INTOSAI
standards in a timely manner;
vi) GoL introduces a comprehensive
intergovernmental fiscal transfer
framework in order to better align policy
priorities with the budget.
MoF, WB, ADB No functional
classification of the
budget currently
exists.
More than 2,000
bank accounts
operating outside
the control of the
MoF.
Budget planning is
not based on a
normative system.
Current reporting is
on an annual basis,
with the report
published more than
5 months after end
of fiscal year.
Budget classification aligns
with IMF-GFS and
functional classification of
budget implemented.
TSA established and
centralized treasury structure
implemented.
Budget norms developed for
health and education sectors
GoL Financial Information
System fully established.
New Audit Law is
implemented.
Revised Chart of
Accounts and
functional
classification system
implemented in FY
2008/09 Budget.
Consolidation of
GoL accounts within
a unified TSA
structure is able to
show consolidated
GoL position in real
time.
Budgeting for health
and education sector
done based on a
system of budget
norms.
Quality budget
execution reports
produced for
2008/2009.
Budget
Audit s carried out to
INTOSAI standards
by 2010.
109
VD§
Goal Action GoL Lead
Agency
&
DP Focal Point
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
DPs supporting national PFM systems:
vii) DPs clarify and share with GoL and
other DPs their respective legal and
policy regulations for the use of national
PFM systems and standards to deliver
ODA;
viii) DPs increasingly align PFM support to
GoL priorities;
ix) DPs increasingly adopt GoL procedures,
rules and regulations;
x) DPs increase ODA delivered through aid
modalities, such as direct budget
support, that best support PBAs and
reduce transaction costs;
xi) DPs increase the percentage of untied aid
executed by GoL as encouraged by the
2001 DAC Recommendation Untying
Official Development Assistance to
Least Developed Countries.
MoF,WB, ADB 34% of ODA to the
public sector uses
GoL PFM systems
[OECD-DAC]
-45% ODA used Budget
Execution Procedures-30
% ODA used Financial
Reporting procedures
-28% ODA used State
Audit procedures:
5% of total ODA
disbursed through
PBAs (including
direct budget)
[OECD-DAC].
75-80% of ODA is
untied (ODA Report
2005).
54% of ODA to the
public sector uses
GoL PFM systems
(Global: 33%
increase from
baseline).
33% of total ODA
disbursed through
PBAs (including
direct budget)
[OECD-DAC].
90% of ODA is
untied (desk review
DAC Survey).
5.(VD
13,31)
Aid is more
Transparent
and
predictable.
i) DPs and GoL develop a common format
for reporting total, sectoral and project
level aid flows over a multi-year period,
compatible with revised ODA database;
ii) DPs strive to make indicative and
transparent commitments of ODA over
annual or multi-year period, in line with
Lao Financial Year where possible;
MoFA,UN
[UNDP]
Gap between DPs’
disbursed ODA and
GoL recorded as
disbursed is 30%
(OECD-DAC
survey).
Common format decided by
end 2008.
Gap between DPs’
disbursed ODA and
amount recorded by
GoL as disbursed is
15%.
All DPs use
common format for
either annual or
multi-year period.
110
VD§
Goal Action GoL Lead
Agency
&
DPFocalPoint
Baseline
2005/06 Lao FY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
Lao FY
iii) DPs aid is predictable and released on
time, where mutually agreed conditions
have been met;
iv) DPs work with GoL to strengthen
absorptive capacity of GoL to effectively
follow upon/use ODA pledges;
v) GoL to present annual budget reports to
the National Assembly & citizens, which
include ODA.
Strengthening National Procurement Regulations and Procedures
6.(VD
6,8,15,
16)
GoL and DPs
commit sufficient
resources to
strengthening
procurement
regulations and
procedures and
enhance their
efficiency,
transparency and
utilization.
i) DPs clarify and share with GoL and
other DPs their respective legal and
policy regulations for the use of national
procurement systems and standards to
deliver ODA;
ii) GoL and DPs jointly review and decide
on acceptable criteria on procurement
regulations and procedures;
iii) GoL Procurement Manual and Standard
Bidding Documents are distributed to
DPs;
iv) GoL fully implements new procurement
decree;
v) GoL recruits and trains sufficient
number of staff at the PrMO;
vi) Systematic collection of procurement
MoF,WB [X%] of public
procurements
through competitive
procedures
(note: data from
PrMO end 2007).
[X%] of public
procurements
through Standard
Bidding Documents
(Note: data from
PrMO end 2007).
17% of DPs use
GoLs procurement
procedures (OECD-
DAC).
Recommendations from joint
review shared with GoL and
DPs by 2008.
Procurement website
developed by end 2007
(PrMO currently in process
of developing).
Procurement Manual and
Standard Bidding Documents
updated and made publicly
accessible by 2008.
[X%] of public
procurements
through competitive
procedures
(PrMO).
[X%] of public
procurements
through Standard
Bidding Documents
(PrMO).
40% of DPs use
GoLs procurement
procedures
(OECD-DAC).
111
VD§
Goal Action GoLLead
Agency
&
DPFocalPoint
Baseline
2005/06 Lao FY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
information and monitoring of
performance and outcomes (through
PrMO);
vii) DPs increasingly adopt GoL procedures,
rules and regulations to manage ODA-
related procurement.
Strengthening Environmental and Social Standards for ODA-Funded Projects
7.(VD
17)
With DP support,
GoL develops
technical & policy
capacity for social,
gender &
environmental
impact analysis &
enforcement
legislation.
i) DPs clarify and share with GoL and
other DPs their respective legal and
policy regulations for the use of national
environmental and social standards in
ODA projects and programs;
ii) Review current guide lines, standards and
legislation for conducting social
(including gender, HIV/AIDS and
Employment, etc) and environmental
impact analysis for ODA projects, and
identify/implement areas that need
improvement;
iii) Discussion and approval of new
guidelines/monitoring indicators for
environmental and social impact
analysis;
iv) Strengthen the capacity of relevant GoL
agencies to enforce the above
regulations.
STEA, UN
[FAO],
Sweden /
SIDA
Assessment completed by
mid 2008.
Revised guidelines /
standards drafted and
approved by end
2008.
Development of joint
monitoring indicators.
Guidelines
implemented.
Social impact
assessments include
gender assessment.
Use of Joint
Monitoring
indicators
Adoption of
harmonised
environmental and
social standards at
all levels of
government.
All applicable ODA
projects adhere to
social and
environmental
legislation that is
112
VD§
Goal Action GoLLead
Agency
&
DPFocalPoint
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
monitored and
enforced by GoL
3. Harmonisation and Simplification: DPs’Actions are more Harmonized, Transparent and Collectively Effective
1.(VD
18)
GoL & DPs
conduct & use core
diagnostic reviews,
carryout joint
reviews & share
results.
i) Through the SWGs where appropriate,
GoL and DPs share list of planned
country analytical work; identify priority
research gaps and areas for joint country
analytical work;
ii) GoL and DPs conduct joint analytical
work wherever possible;
iii) Mechanisms identified and implemented
to share research/review results to DPs,
line ministries and provincial GoL (eg.
RTM website or global CAW site).
EC
UN [UNDP]
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs,
where
appropriate.
30% of CAW is
joint (OECD/DAC)
[Global: 30% of
country analytic
work is joint
(2004)]
Consolidated list developed,
disaggregated by
sector/programme on annual
or multi-annual basis.
Joint research programme
decided for 2 sectors by 2008
(Health, Education).
66% of CAWis
joint.
[global: 66%]
2.(VD
19,22)
DPs harmonise
training and reduce
administrative
burden of GoL
related to the
number of
duplicative
missions.
i) DPs pursue decentralization &
delegation of authority to country
offices;
ii) GoL and DPs decide on, and document
coreprinciples/goodpractices regarding
missions and training scheduling,
including consideration of mission
freeperiod(s)(eg.April to June
-annual plan formulation);
DIC, MoFA, EC
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs,
where
appropriate.
550 Missions in
2005/06
(OECD/DAC).
12% of missions are
joint
(OECD/DAC).
Best practices identified by
December2007.
Harmonised and/or joint
mission and training
schedules introduced for
pilot sectors (Transport,
Education&Health) by
2008.
50% of missions are
joint.
113
VD§
Goal Action GoLLead
Agency
&
DPFocalPoint
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
iii) GoL and DPs (through the SWGs, where
appropriate) share their training and
mission plans and organize harmonized
and/or joint training and missions where
applicable;
iv) DPs increasingly share findings from
missions among DPs and GoL (eg.RTM
3.(VD
20,25)
GoL & DPs
rationalize
regulations,
procedures &
incentives by
implementing
common
arrangements.
i) GoL and DPs decide on which DP
regulations and procedures should use
common arrangements and timetable for
implementation;
- DSA, salaries;
ii) DPs carry out an overall review of above
identified current practices and
recommend policy/ practice to harmonize
DP procedures & incentives;
iii) Common procedures implemented
(beginning in PBA sectors: Transport,
Education, and Health).
PACSA,MoF,
EC
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs,
where
appropriate.
ADB
(Transport)&
Identification of procedures
and time table by end 2007.
DSA and salaries of GoL
staff on ODA projects
harmonized by 2008.
GoL Guidelines
gradually introduced
and, where possible,
applied to on-going
projects/
programmes.
4.(VD
21)
GoL and DPs
increase aid
effectiveness
through
coordinated
approaches e.g.
PBAs.
i) GoL reviews and improves (where
necessary) national financial systems to
channel budget support and pooled
funding identified for PBA to relevant
sector;
ii) DPs expand use of coordinated approaches
to programming and resource
mobilisation through SWG framework.
MoF,
Line Ministries
with support
from SWGs.
5%ofODA
disbursed to PBAs
(including direct
budget support).
(OECD-DAC)
DPs coordinate programs in
Health, Education and
Transport sectors.
33% of ODA
disbursed to PBAs
(including direct
budget support).
114
VD§
Goal Action GoLLead
Agency
&
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
4. Managing For Results: Managing Resources and Improving Decision-Making For Results
1.(26,
28)
Results orientated
frameworks, that
both GoL and DPs
use, enable
monitoring of
development
results and of
progress toward aid
effectiveness.
i) Further strengthen the national statistical
system by implementing the National
Statistics Strategy 2006-10;
ii) Develop a set of indicators to monitor
progress at national and sectoral levels,
and decide on surveys/studies to collect
data for these indicators and their
periodicity;
iii) Develop, train on and implement results
orientated frameworks to monitor and
evaluate the 1) implementation and 2)
impact of the NSEDP and sector
programmes, using strengthened national
statistical systems and other tools such as
the Lao Info database and MDG Report;
iv) DPs work with GoL to prepare joint
formats for periodic reporting and align
to above results oriented frame works;
v) Review progress of SWGs against their
own Joint Monitoring Indicators
vi) Develop and implement mechanism to
monitor progress against aid-
effectiveness commitments set out in
CAP;
CPI, UN
[UNDP],
Sweden/
SIDA
National Statistical
Strategy for 2006-
10 has been
completed.
Develop & implement
Master Plan.
Statistical needs assessment
by end 2007.
National and sectoral
indicators decided.
Lao Info is used by GoL as a
monitoring tool for
implementation of NSEDP.
2007 MDG Progress Report
published.
Results Frameworks for
general NSEDP prepared
ands hared by end 2007:
Sector Specific Results
Frameworks for Transport
by end 2007, and for
Education and Health by
end 2008.
General simple joint format
for monitoring and reporting
endorsed by DPs by mid
2008.
Results Frameworks
well advanced by
2010.
All DPs use common
formats for
monitoring and
reporting.
ODA Database fully
operational, data
reliable and
transparently
available to GoL and
DPs by 2010.
115
VD§
Goal Action GoLLead
Agency
&
DPFocalPoint
vii) Continue to participate in the OECD-
DAC Survey;
viii) Revise the ODA Database to provide
transparent and accurate reports on
ODA-financed projects and programmes
showing financial inputs (commitments
& disbursements) and output progress.
Information is shared across MoFA,
MoF,CPI and line ministries and with
DPs.
Baseline
2005/06LaoFY
Performance Milestones Target
2010/11
LaoFY
OECD-DAC Country
Worksheet April2009.
Proposal for revised ODA
database shared and
endorsed by GoL and DPs
by 2008.
5. Mutual Accountability: Both GoL and DPs are Accountable for Development Results
1.(VD
29)
Progress over
decided
commitments on
aid effectiveness is
assessed.
i) GoL and DPs report on and assess
progress in CAP implementation at CAP
Review Meetings, and outcomes of which
are presented at RTIM;
ii) GoL and DPs undertake independent
evaluations/assessments of particular
aid-effectiveness issues.
DIC, MoFA,
UN [UNDP]
First CAP Review Meeting
held in October/November
2007
CAP implementation
reported at RTIM2007.
Identify topics and timetable
for evaluations and funding
arrangements by end 2007.
Regular mutual
assessments shared.
(Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2007
116
APENDIX 3
"QUESTIONS FOR DEEP PERSONAL INTERVIEW":
Self Introduction: My Name is Khammany Inthirath; I am now doing my PhD
Dissertation on “Effective Aid Coordination in Lao PDR: Policy Implications for
Power Sector Development”. I would like to have your assistance in answering my
questions.
Section I: Overview about ODA Coordination System
1. What do you know about external assistance coordination for Lao PDR, about ODA
using in Lao PDR?
2. What do you think about/ assess the current situation of external assistance
coordination and ODA using in Lao PDR in general and in power sector in particular?
Do you know any model of effective use of it?
3. Do you know any country in the world where ODA is used effectively most? What
lessons Lao PDR can learn from them?
4. How do you think about power sector development situation? What do you expect
from the sector development in the next ten to fifteen years ahead?
5. What do you suggest for the government of Lao PDR to make the external assistance/
ODA effectively used and to further the power sector?
6. Do you have any other recommendation regarding the mentioned subject?
7. What is the aid effectiveness agenda in Lao PDR? Who are the involving institutions?
8. What is the local effort from international agencies and donor communities for aid
effectiveness in Laos?
9. Does the local development community support the local government in aid
coordination?
Section 2: Purpose of Development Partner Coordination Units
10. What kinds of activities does the donor coordination unit carry out?
Section 3: Roles and Responsibilities of Development Partner Coordination Units
11. Who manages the Development Partner Coordination Units?
117
12. What is the role of the Development Partner Coordination Units?
13. Who makes decisions in the Development Partner Coordination Units?
Section 4: Organization of Development Partner Coordination Units
14. Is the donor coordination unit a standalone unit or is part of a larger unit?
15. What is the name of the department under which the Development Partner
Coordination Units exists?
16. How many coordination units do you have?
17. How many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are working in the energy sector?
18. How many international NGOs (INGOs) are working in the your sector?
19. How many people work in the Development Partner Coordination Units?
20. Who makes up the Development Partner Coordination Units?
21. How many development partners are active in your institution?
Section 5: Financing
22. How is the Development Partner Coordination Units supported?
23. How are the Development Partners’ Funds channeled through your institution?
24. What type of budget support are the Development Partners providing?
25. What are the contractual arrangements that govern the relationship with the
Development Partners in your institute?
26. How do you make decisions in terms of funds allocation and reallocation?
27. Do you monitor the expenditures by different donors/NGOs?
28. For what kind of donor/NGO projects/activities do you monitor the expenditures?
29. Please specify how you link donor/NGO expenditure monitoring with your donor
coordination?
30. Who pays for the donor coordination unit activities?
Section 6: Strengths and Accomplishments
31. What do you consider to be the strengths of Development Partner Coordination Units?
32. How would you rate the efficiency (time/money/outputs) of the donor coordination
activities?
118
33. How do you monitor the activities that have to be accomplished by different
donors/NGOs?
34. Do you have a comprehensive energy sector plan which comprises most of the
donors/NGOs activities?
35. Does the plan have output and/or outcomes indicators?
36. How did you establish the indicators?
37. Are there certain elements of your donor coordination activities that you would like to
highlight or describe further?
Section 7: Challenges
38. What do you consider to be the weaknesses of the Development Partner Coordination
Units?
39. What do you consider to be the major/important internal challenges for the unit?
40. Do you monitor the flow of funds (incoming) from donors/ NGO activities?
41. Are the funds entering regularly (as scheduled)?
42. Do you know when different donors’ and international and national NGOs’ support
will expire?
43. Do you map the duration and expiration of donors’ and NGOs’ support?
44. How is the Ministry of Energy and Mines planning to respond to the phasing
out/expiration of donors’ and NGOs’ support?
119
APENDIX 4
The List of Interviewees
(Full name, capacity, name of organization, Contact number).
1. Prime Mister’s office, National Committee For Business Development 01 People
1. Mr. Phayvanh CHANHDAVONG Deputy Director General Executive Secretary to
the Minister, President of NCBD. Mobile Phone: 8520 55527829. Email:
chandavong@yahoo.com
2. Ministry of Planning and Investment 5 People
1. Dr. Bounthavy SYSOUPHANHTHONG, Vice-Minister of Ministry of Planning and
Investment. Office Tel : 85621 217020
2. Dr. Kikeo, Director General of Ministry of Planning and Investment Office. Office
Tel : 85621 217010
3. Mr. Phesai PHIATHEP, Director General of Planning Department. Office Tel : 85621
217009
4. Mr. Achong LAOMAO, Acting Director General of Investment Promotion
Department. Office Tel : 85621 223002
5. Ms. Sisoumboun AONAVONG, Acting Director General of Internal Corporation
Department. Office Tel : 85621 216755
3. Ministry of Justice 1 People
1. Mr. Vilath PHEWON Director General of Ministry of Justice Office Mobile Phone :
85620 99801552
4. Ministry of Education and Sport 2 People
1. Dr. Saikhong SAINASIN, Vice Dean of National University of Lao Office Tel :
85621 770381
2. Dr. Phosy CHANHMING, Deputy Director Research Office of National University of
Lao. Mobile phone: 85620 23300555. E-mail : phosyc@gmail.com
5. Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) 9 People
120
1. Mr Viraphonh VIRAVONG, Vice-Minister of Ministry of Energy and Mines Office
Tel: 85621 413000/454614
2. Dr. Sinava SOUPHANOUVONG, Vice-Minister of Ministry of Energy and Mines
Office Tel: 85621 413000
3. Dr. Bountheung PHENGVONGSA, Director General of Ministry of Energy and
Mines Office. Mobile Phone : 85620 55519338
4. Dr. Daovong PHONKEO, Director General of Power Policy and Planning Department
Mobile Phone : 85620 99801592 E-mail daovongph@yahoo.com
5. Dr. Xayphone BOUNSOU, Vice Minister Assistant, Deputy Manager of Planning
Division. Mobile phone: 85620 22435770. E-mail: xayphone3000@yahoo.co.jp
6. Mr. Saypaseuth PHOMSOUPHA, Director General of Business Department Mobile
phone : 85620 45253940 E-mail: xayphaseuth@deb.gov.la
7. Mr. Sisoukan SAYARATH, Director General of Energy Management Department
Mobile phone :85620 99801583 E-mail: sisoukansayarath@yahoo.com
8. Mr. Hatsady SISOURAYH, Director General of Institute of Renewable Energy
Promotion. Mobile: 85620 55511537 E-mail: hatsady@demem.org
9. Mr. Stuart GLAUBERMAN, Public Relations Advisor (America) to the Department
of Energy Policy and Planning Mobile phone : 85620 28121844
E-mail: stuxb808@gmail.com
6. World Bank (WB) 1 People
1. Mr. Veasna BUN, WB Team Leader for Rural Electrification Phase II Project. Office
Tel : 85621 266200. E-mail : vbun@worldbank.org
7. International Finance Corporation (IFC) 2 People
1. Mr. Almilion CHATZINIKOLAOU ADB Representative to Lao PDR, Office Tel:
85621 266300. Website : www.ifc.org/Mekong
2. Ms. Sisomsouk SAIMOUNKHOUN, Office Administrator of IFC
Mobile Phone: 85620 55518670. E-mail: tsaimoungkhoun@ifc.org
8. Asian Development Bank (ADB) 2 People
1. Mr. Takafumi Kadono, Energy Special Vietnam Resident Mission Position, Office
Tel: +844 39331374. E-mail: tkadono@adb.org
121
2. Mr. Phosay PHOMMACHANH, Project Officer ADB-Lao PDR Mission. Office
Tel: 85621 250444
9. Electricity of Laos (EDL) 9 People
1. Mr. Sisavath THIRAVONG, Managing Director & CEO of Electricity of Laos
Mobile: 85620 55512749 E-mail: sisavth_th@yahoo.com
2. Mr. Thongphet DOUANGNGEUNE, Deputy Managing Director of Electricity of
Laos Mobile: 85620 22223687 E-mail: dthongphet@YAHOO.COM
3. Mr. Bountham SENEPHANSIRI, Deputy Managing Director of Electricity of Laos
Mobile: 85620 55570021 E-mail: bounthamsp@yahoo.com
4. Mr. Vongmany SONEKETSOULINH, Deputy Managing Director of Electricity of
Laos Mobile: 85620 22223799 E-mail: vongmany-s@hotmail.com
5. Mr. Duangsy PHARAYOK, Deputy Managing Director of Electricity of Laos
Mobile: 85620 22333000 E-mail: duangsy@yahoo.com
6. Mr. Komonchanh PHETASA, Manager of Business Department, Mobile Phone :
85620 55555868 E-mail: komon128@hotmail.com
7. Mr. Bounma MANIVONG, Manager of Finance Department Mobile Phone : 85620
555506739 E-mail: bm.mani09@gmail.com
8. Mr. Ken THEPVONGSA, Manager of Transmission Line and Substation Department,
Mobile Phone: 85620 22805666.
9. Mr. Khamsing PHOSARATH, Manager of Technical Department, Mobile Phone:
85620 55530849.
10. EDL Generation Public Company (EDL-GEN) 3 People
1. Mr. BounOum SYVANPHENG, Managing Director & CEO Mobile Phone :
8562022223899 E-mail bounoum_syv@yahoo.com / edlgenhq@edlgen.com.la
2. Ms. Rattana PRATHOUMVAN , Deputy Managing Director, COO Mobile Phone :
(856-20) 96966555 & 22205084 E-mail: lattana2005@yahoo.com /
rettanadmd@edlgen.com.la
3. Mr Dr. Bounsalong SOUTHIDARA, Deputy Managing Director, CFO. Mobile
Phone : (856-20) 96964555 / Office: (856-21) 316140
E-mail : bounsalong@gmail.com / bounsalong@edlgen.com.la
11. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) 2 People
122
1. Mr. Takayuki Niimura, Expert Policy advisor of Department of Energy Policy and
Planning. Office Tel : 85621 415038 Email:hashisan2001@yahoo.com.co.jp
2. Mr. Nobuo HASHIMOTO, Expert Policy advisor of Department of Energy Policy and
Planning. Office Tel : 85621 415038 Email: takayuki.niimura@gmail.com
12. National IT Promotion Agency (NIPA) from Korea 2 People
1. Dr. Dok-Han Kim, Expert Finance of Electricity of Laos. Tel : 85620 96590680
Email: kdh0567@yahoo.com
2. Mr. Tai Dong Lee, Expert Hydropower of Electricity of Laos. Tel: 85620 95329494
Email: tdlee0502@naver.com
123
APPENDIX 5
Energy Development Plan
5.2. Projection of Investment on Northern Region Power Development Sources from
2010-2020
Location
(Province)
Capacity
(MW)
Energy/
year
Project
Value
EDL
Loan
EDL
contribution
No. Project Names
Province MW
GWh
p.a.
Phant
Factor
Project
Period
Completion
Year
Project
Types Mill.
US$
Mill.
US$
Mill.
US$
%
1 Nam Nhon Bokeo 2.4 11.5 55% 2006-10 2010 BOT 4.50
2 Nam Tha 3 Luangnamtha 1.3 8 70% 2010-11 2011 BOT 1.50
3 Nam Ngum 5 Vientiane 120 500 48% 2001-11 2011 BOT 200.00 6 3.0%
4 Nam Long Luangnamtha 5 38 87% 2009-12 2012 BOT 12.90 0.78 6.0%
5 Nam Sim Huaphanh 8 30 43% 2011-13 2013 BOT 19.40
6 Nam Ham 2 Sayaboury 5 15 34% 2011-13 2013 BOT 8.00
7 Nam Khan 2 Luangprabang 126.9 568 51% 2010-14 2014 BT 314.60 298.87 15.73 5.0%
8 Nam Boun 2 Phongsaly 15 96 73% 2011-14 2014 BT 30.00 27 3 10.0%
9 Nam Ngiew
Xieng
Khuang
20 63 36% 2010-14 2014 BOT 38.00
10 Nam Beng Oudomxai 34 200 67% 2010-14 2014 BOT 65.00
11 Nam Tha 1 Luangnamtha 168 721 49% 2009-14 2014 BOT 350.00
12
Viengphoukha
(Lignite)
Luangnamtha 200 1401.6 80% 2011-14 2014 BOT 420.00
13 Nam Pot
Xieng
Khuang
20 87.6 50% 2010-14 2014 BOT 44.00
14 Nam Chein
Xieng
Khuang
80 390 56% 2010-15 2015 BT 165.00 148.5 16.5 10.0%
15 Nam Phak Oudomxai 30 165 63% 2009-15 2015 BT 43.60 43.56
16 Hongsa (Lignite) Sayaboury 100 700.8 80% 2008-15 2015 BOT 3,728.00
17 Nam Ngiep 2
Xieng
Khuang
180 1170 74% 2010-15 2015 BOT 345.40
18 Nam Phak Luangnamtha 130 750 66% 2010-15 2015 BOT 208.00
19 Nam Ngum 4
Xieng
Khuang
220 1100 57% 2010-15 2015 BOT 696.00
20 Nam Ou 2 Luangprabang 120 545.8 52% 2008-16 2016 BOT 226.00
21 Nam Ou 6 Phongsaly 90 417.9 53% 2008-16 2016 BOT 290.00
22 Nam Khan 3 Luangprabang 47 222 54% 2011-16 2016 BT 117.00 111.15 6 5.1%
23
Nam Xam 1 (Off
take)
Huaphanh 60 214 41% 2009-16 2016 BOT 117.00
24
Mekong
(Sayaboury, (Off
take)
Sayaboury 60 420 80% 2008-19 2017 BOT 2,497.50
25
Mekong
Luangprabang,
(Off take)
Luangprabang 150 660 50% 2008-17 2017 BOT 2,794.00
26 Mekong Pakbeng Luangprabang 150 754 57% 2010-20 2019 BOT 2,994.00
27 Nam Ou 5 Phongsaly 240 1156.3 55% 2011-16 2016 BOT 291.00
28 Nam Ou 1 Luangprabang 160 798.9 57% 2010-18 2018 BOT 256.00
29 Nam Ou 3 Luangprabang 150 709.6 54% 2010-18 2018 BOT 244.00
30 Nam Ou 4 Phongsaly 116 569 56% 2010-18 2018 BOT 251.00
31 Nam Ou 7 Phongsaly 190 915.4 55% 2010-18 2018 BOT 373.00
Total (2010-2015) 1466 8016 62% 100% 17,144.40 629.1 48
EDL 252 1219 55% 17.20% 670.20 629.1 48
124
IPP(d) 1114 6096 62% 76.00% 2,638.70
IPP(e) 100 701 80% 6.80% 12,420.50
Total (2016-2020) 1533 7383 55% 100% 18,858.80 692 52.8
EDL 47 222 54% 3.10% 737.20 692 52.8
IPP(d) 976 4695 55% 63.70% 2,902.60
IPP(e) 510 2466 55% 33.30% 13,662.60
Total (2010-2020) 2999 15398 59% 100% 36,003.20 1321.1 100.8
EDL 299 1441 55% 10.00% 1,407.30 1321.1 100.8
IPP(d) 2090 10791 59% 69.70% 5,541.30
IPP(e) 610 3167 59% 20.30% 26,083.10
125
5.3. Projection of Investment on Central Region Power Development Sources 2010-2020
Location
(Province)
Capacity
(MW)
Energy/
year
Project
Value
EDL
Loan
EDL
contribution
No. Project Names
Province MW
GWh
p.a.
Phant
Factor
Project
Period
Completion
Year
Project
Types Mill.
US$
Mill.
US$
Mill.
US$
%
Owner
1 Nam Lik 1/2 Vientiane 100 435 50% 2008-10 2010 BOT 150 IPP(d)
2 Nam Ngum 2 Vientiane 615 2218 41% 2006-10 2010 BOT 790 60 IPP(e)
3
Nam Song
(Extension) Vientiane 6 28 53% 2008-11 2011 BT 13.3 11 2.3 17% EDL
4 Nam Phao Bolikhamxai 1.5 3.3 25% 2008-11 2011 BOT 3.5 IPP(d)
5
Theunhinboun
(Extension) Bolikhamxai 220 946 49% 2008-12 2012 BOT 498 86.4 17% IPP(e)
6 Nam Gnuang 8 Bolikhamxai 60 316 60% 2009-12 2012 BOT 120 IPP(d)
7 Nam Sana Vientiane 10 43.8 50% 2010-13 2013 BT 31.37 31.37 EDL
8
Nam Ngum 1
(Extension) Vientiane 40 88 25% 2010-14 2014 BT 70 63 7 10% EDL
9 Nam Mang 1 Bolikhamxai 50 235 54% 2010-14 2014 BOT 196.6 IPP(d)
10 Nam Lik 1 Vientiane 60 248.7 47% 2010-14 2014 BOT 130 IPP(d)
11 Nam Kan Vientiane 5 19.7 45% 2010-14 2014 BOT 5.5 IPP(d)
12 Kengseuaten Bolikhamxai 45 200 51% 2009-15 2015 BT 90 EDL
13 Nam Bak Vientiane 160 740 53% 2010-15 2015 BOT 260 15.6 IPP(d)
14 Nam Phai Vientiane 60 280 53% 2010-15 2015 BOT 110.5 IPP(d)
15
Nam Theun 1 (Off
take) Bolikhamxai 50 250 57% 2008-17 2017 BOT 695 IPP(e)
16 Nam Mouan Bolikhamxai 105 472.1 51% 2010-17 2017 BOT 271.4 IPP(d)
17 Nam San 3 (Down)
Xieng
Khuang 30 120 46% 2010-18 2018 BOT 76 IPP(d)
18 Nam Ngum (Down)
Vientiane
Capital 60 300 57% 2010-18 2018 BOT 122 IPP(d)
19
Nam Ngeip 1 (Off
take) Bolikhamxai 18 102 65% 2010-18 2018 BOT 344 IPP(e)
20 Nam Phouan Vientiane 60 280 53% 2010-19 2019 BOT 115 IPP(d
Total (2010-2015) 1433 5801 46% 100% 4092.2 181 95.7
EDL 101 360 41% 7.1% 204.7 181 95.7
IPP(d) 497 2278 52% 34.7% 1560.5
IPP(e) 835 3164 43% 58.3% 2327
Total (2016-2020) 323 1524 54% 100% 4501.4 199.1 105.3
EDL 225.1 199.1 105.3
IPP(d) 255 1172 52% 78.9% 1716.6
IPP(e) 68 352 59% 21.1% 2559.7
Total (2010-2020) 1756 7326 48% 100% 8593.6 380 201
EDL 101 360 41% 5.8% 429.8 380 201
IPP(d) 752 3450 52% 42.8% 3277.1
IPP(e) 903 3516 44% 51.4% 4886.7
126
APPENDIX 6
Projection of Investment on Power Development Sources from 2010-2020 (Whole Country)
Capacity
(MW)
Energy/ year Project Value EDL Loan
EDL
contribution Project Names
MW GWh p.a. Mill. US$ Mill. US$ Mill. US$
Total (2010-2015) 3,945 20,321 25,939.70 1,204.2 175.7
EDL 548 2,693 1,450.90 1,204.2 175.7
IPP(d) 2,373 13,427 6,955.30
IPP(e) 1,024 4,201 16,118.50
Total (2016-2020) 2,761 13,636 28,533.70 1,324.6 193.2
EDL 103 372 1,596.00 1,324.6 193.2
IPP(d) 2,010 10,168 7,650.80
IPP(e) 648 3,096 17,730.40
Total (2010-2020) 6,706 33,957 54,473.40 2,528.8 368.9
EDL 650 3,065 3,047.00 2,528.8 368.9
IPP(d) 4,383 23,595 14,606.10
IPP(e) 1,672 7,297 33,848.90
d = domestic
e = export
IPP = Independent Power Producer
EDL = Electricity Due Laos.
The table above shows the projection of power development plan between 2010 and
2020. During the period, the target of development plan is to install production facility
with the capacity of 6,706 MW, with energy production of 33,957 GWh per annum. The
total investment cost will be 54,573.4 million US$. Among these, EDL will invest 3
billion US$, while IPP for domestic will invest 14.6 billion US$ and IPP for export will
invest 33.8 billion US$. The EDL plans to borrow 2,528.8 million US$, perhaps through
ODA as low interest loan if possible, or commercial loan. EDL will invest its own fund
of 368.9 million US$ during the period of 2010 and 2020.
127
APPENDIX 7
Detail estimate of energy sector projection
1. Existing Production Facility
Name of Project Location
Installed
Capacity
Status Investors (Sponsors)
No.
Province (MW)
Progress
of project
Commercial
Operation
Date
Owner-
ships
Equity share
Planned Market Remarks
1 Nam Dong (H) Luangprabang 1 In Operation 1970 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos
2 Selabam (H) Champasak 5 In Operation 1970 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos
3 Nam Ngum 1 (H) Vientiane 155 In Operation 1971 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos/ Thailand
4 Xeset 1 (H) Saravane 45 In Operation 1990 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos/ Thailand
5 Nam Ko (H) Oudomxay 1.5 In Operation 1996 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos
• EdL (Laos) 60%
• Nordic 20% 6 Theun-Hinboun (H) Bolikhamxay 210 In Operation 1998 IPP(e)
• GMS 20%
Laos/ Thailand
IPP(e) • EdL (Laos) 20%
• Suez Energy
(Belgium) 60% 7 Houay Ho (H) Champasak/ Attapeu 152.1 In Operation 1999
• HHTC (Thailand)
20%
Laos/ Thailand
150MW
(Export) and
2.1MW
(Domestic)
8 Nam Leuk (H) Vientiane 60 In Operation 2000 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos/ Thailand
9 Nam Ngay (H) Phongsaly 1.2 In Operation 2003 EdL • EdL(Laos) 100% Laos
10 Nam Mang3 (H) Vientiane 40 In Operation 2004 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos/ Thailand
11 Xeset 2 (H) Saravane 76 In Operation 2009 EdL • EdL (Laos) 100% Laos
12 Nam Theun 2 Khammuane 1088 In Operation 2009 IPP(e)
LHSE (Laos) 25%,
EDF (France) 35%,
EGCO (Thailand)
25%, ITD (Thailand)
15%
Laos/ Thailand
Off take 75
MW
(Domestic)
13 Nam Lik 1/2
100
2010 IPP(e)
Micro-hydro
1.405 In Operation
Prov. • Prov. (Laos) 100% Laos
Solar
0.214 In Operation
Prov. • Prov. (Laos) 100% Laos
Diesel
0.74 In Operation
Prov. • Prov. (Laos) 100% Laos
Total 1937.2
EdL 384.7
IPP(e) 1550.1
Prov. 2.36
(H): Hydropower plant FS: Feasibility Study
EdL: Electricité du Laos (EdL) HOA: Head of Agreement
IPP: Independent Power Producer MOU: Memorandum of Understanding
IPP(e): Exporting IPP PDA: Project Development Agreement
IPP(d): Domestic IPP PPA: Power Purchase Agreement
TBD: To Be Determined
SIOD: Start Initial Operation Date
128
2. Demand Forecast
Northern Area Descriptions Units 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Phongsaly
1
2
3
Sub-Total
Copper Mining 1 at Yot Ou District
Copper Mining 2 at Yot Ou District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.3
11.8
2.3
11.8
13
Bokeo
1
Sub-Total
Dokngiewkham
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
1.2
0.2
1.2
0.2
1.2
0.2
1.2
2
12
12
Luangnamtha
1
2
3
4
5
Sub-Total
Copper Mining at Houay Mo, Long District
Economic Spacial Zone (Boten)
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
Railway station
Train running
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.9
10.9
61.8
10.0
56.9
0.9
4.9
15.8
87.6
10.1
57.4
5.0
26.3
0.8
3.9
65.9
350.6
10.2
57.8
8.0
42.0
47.7
250.7
53
35
Oudomxai
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sub-Total
Cement Factory at Thong Na Village, Namo District
Copper Mining at Kiew Chep Village-, Namo District
Iron melting factory, at Phu Phan Village, La
District
Lead- Zinc Factory at Nam Pheng Village, Namo
District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
Total Load during Construction of Railway
Railway station
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
52.0
273.3
-
-
52.0
273.3
62.0
330.2
10.0
56.9
-
-
52.0
273.3
62.1
330.7
10.1
57.4
-
-
52.0
273.3
67.3
357.9
10.2
57.8
5.1
26.8
52.0
273.3
30
11
Xiengkhuang
1
2
3
Sub-Total
Iron melting factory, at Nator Village, Khoun
District
Iron melting factory, at Yot Pieng Village, Pek
District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
18.0
94.6
18.0
94.6
18.0
94.6
18.0
94.6
-
-
-
-
6.0
31.5
6.0
31.5
52
41
Huaphanh
1
Sub-Total
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.2
6.3
1.2
6.3
1.2
6.3
1.2
6.3
Luangprabang
1
2
3
4
5
Sub-Total
Cement factory at Many Village, Nambak District
Gold Mining at Phapon Village, Pak Ou District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
Total Load during Construction of Railway
Railway station
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
46.6
247.6
7.0
39.4
-
-
39.6
208.1
47.7
253.6
7.1
39.7
1.0
5.7
-
-
39.6
208.1
47.7
253.9
7.1
40.1
1.0
5.7
-
-
39.6
208.1
90.7
479.7
7.2
40.4
1.0
5.7
42.9
225.4
39.6
208.1
38
32
Sayaboury
1
2
Sub-Total
Copper Mining at Pang Kham Village, Paklay
District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
2.8
0.5
2.8
0.5
2.8
0.5
2.8
10
Total (Northern)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
116.8
616.4
138.6
740.2
127.5
682.4
234.0
1,241.8
390.4
2,127.0
129
Central Area Descriptions Units 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2
Vientiane Province
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sub-Total
Phubia Gold/copper Mining
Phubia Gold/copper Mining( Hoayxai )
Iron melting factory, at Vangvieng District
Iron melting factory, at Namchan Village,
Saysomboon District
Cement Factory at Vangvieng (Extension)
Iron melting factory, at Vangvieng District
(sinhouang)
Gold/Copper Mining at Maipakphoun Village,
Sanakham District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
Total Load during Construction of Railway
Railway station
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
32.0
210.2
32.0
210.2
59.3
355.0
33.0
216.8
0.9
4.7
25.4
133.5
146.6
926.0
43.0
282.5
20.0
131.4
27.3
203.1
30.0
170.8
0.9
4.7
25.4
133.5
179.4
1,128.9
43.3
284.8
20.2
132.5
12.0
84.0
27.3
203.1
50.0
284.7
1.2
6.5
25.4
133.5
220.8
1,358.0
43.7
287.0
20.3
133.5
12.1
84.7
25.0
142.3
27.3
203.1
50.0
284.7
17.0
89.2
25.4
133.5
387.9
2,164.5
44.0
289.3
20.5
134.6
12.2
85.3
25.2
143.4
27.3
203.1
200.0
1,000.0
48.8
256.2
-
-
10.0
52.6
Vientiane Capital
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sub-Total
Gold Mining at Khok Pheung Village, Sangthong
District
Iron melting factory, at Ban Hai Village (Tha Ngon),
Xaythany District
Kea Potash Factory at Thongmang Village, Saythany
District
Kea Potash Factory at Nathom Village, Saythany
District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
Total Load during Construction of Railway
Railway station
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
10.9
71.2
8.0
56.0
-
-
2.9
15.2
47.0
203.6
5.0
35.0
31.0
96.9
8.1
56.4
-
-
2.9
15.2
96.1
357.4
5.0
35.3
80.0
250.0
8.1
56.9
-
-
2.9
15.2
96.2
358.2
5.1
35.6
80.0
250.0
8.2
57.4
-
-
2.9
15.2
95.4
354.2
5.1
35.8
80.0
250.0
8.3
57.8
-
-
-
-
2.0
10.5
Bolikhamxai
1
Sub-Total
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
0.2
1.3
0.2
1.3
9.2
48.6
9.2
48.6
9.0
47.3
9.0
47.3
7.5
39.4
7.5
39.4
14.3
74.9
14.3
74.9
Total (Central) (MW)
(GWh)
32.0
210.2
70.4
427.5
202.8
1,178.1
284.5
1,533.7
324.4
1,755.6
497.6
2,593.6
Southern Area Descriptions Units 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Khammouane
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sub-Total
Potassium at Yang Koung Village (Ngom Ma Lat)
Thakhek District
Jiaxi Mining at Thakhek District
Metal Melting Factory at Nong Cheun-Borneng
Village, Hinboon District
Cement Factory at Nakham Village, Thakhek
District (Existing)
Cement Factory at Nakham Village, Thakhek
District (Extension)
Economic Spacial Zone
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
17.0
52.0
17.0
52.0
17.0
52.0
17.0
52.0
-
-
17.0
52.0
17.0
52.0
-
-
17.0
52.0
17.0
52.0
-
-
37.0
127.0
20.0
75.0
17.0
52.0
-
-
70
304
20.0
75.0
22.0
124.0
17.0
52.0
5.0
21.9
6.0
31.5
Savannakhet
1
2
3
Sub-Total
Xepon Gold/Copper Mining at Vilabury District
Economic Spacial Zone (Nongdeun)
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
43.0
317.6
43.0
317.6
44.0
323.8
43.5
321.2
0.5
2.5
54.0
380.7
43.5
321.2
10.0
56.9
0.5
2.5
73.5
492.1
43.5
321.2
30.0
170.8
-
-
93.5
605.9
43.5
321.2
50.0
284.7
-
-
93
605
43.5
321.2
50.0
284.7
Champasak
1
2
3
4
5
Sub-Total
Aluminium at Paksong District(SLACO)for the
entire mine
Aluminium at Paksong District(SINOMA) for the
entire mine
Aluminium at Paksong District(SINOMA) for
Alumina refinery
Economic Spacial Zone (Bolaven plateau)
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
35.5
175.7
7.5
8.0
30.7
20.0
145.0
-
-
47.7
312.4
15.0
111.7
8.0
30.7
20.0
145.0
4.7
25.0
63.5
428.0
30.0
223.4
8.0
30.7
20.0
145.0
5.5
28.9
142
991
100.0
744.6
8.0
30.7
20.0
145.0
5.0
21.9
9.5
49.7
Saravan
1
2
Sub-Total
Cement Factory at Ta Leo Village, Saravane District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
12.6
71.7
12.6
71.7
-
-
12.6
71.7
12 6
71.7
-
-
12.6
71.7
1 6
71.7
-
-
13.4
75.6
12 6
71.7
0.8
3.9
28.
154
12.6
71.7
15.8
82.8
Sekong
1
2
Sub-Total
Aluminium at Daklan Village, Dakjung District
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9.6
50.5
9.6
50.5
22.8
119.8
22.8
119.8
58.
305
58.2
305.9
130
Attapeu
1
2
3
Sub-Total
Gold/Copper Mining at Vangtun Village, Xanxai
District
Aluminium at Paksong District(SLACO) for
Alumina refinery
Total Load during Construction of Hydro Power
Plants
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
(MW)
(GWh)
-
-
3.8
19.7
3.8
19.7
3.8
19.7
3.8
19.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total (Southern) (MW)
(GWh)
60.0
369.6
77.3
467.2
122.8
699.8
160.4
978.6
230.1
1,356.4
392
2,362
Whole Country (MW)
(GWh)
92.0
579.8
264.6
1,511.2
464.2
2,618.2
572.5
3,194.7
788.5
4,353.8
1,280.5
7,083.2
131
LIST OF AUTHOR’S PUBLICATIONS
1. Khammany INTHIRATH, Power sector status of Lao PDR and Lao–Vietnam
cooperation on power project development, Lao-Vietnam international Economic
Seminar In Vietiane Capital 26/10/2012, Book III, Pages 104.
2. Khammany INTHIRATH, Promotion of Foreign Direct Investments for the
development of Energy sector in Lao PDR, Lao Magazine ALOUNMAI, Date
October 2011, Page 53.
3. Khammany Inthirath, Investments in Hydropower Development in Lao PDR,
Scientific Seminar Lao PDR – SR of Vietnam, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR, 2011,
Book II, Pages 53
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- Unlock-la_khammanyinthirath_9539.pdf