Luận án Mối quan hệ giữa phát triển tài chính và tầng trưởng kinh tế ở các nước Asean+3 và những gợi ý chính sách cho Việt Nam
Luận án đã kiểm định tác động của phát triển tài chính đến tăng trưởng kinh tế của các nước ASEAN+3, trong đó phát triển tài chính được đại diện bằng Chỉ số phát triển tài chính tổng hợp (FDI). FDI từng quốc gia được tính bằng ba phương pháp khác nhau: phương pháp trọng số bình quân, phương pháp phân tích thành phần chính (PCA) và phương pháp bao dữ liệu (DEA) - cách tiếp cận mới trong đo lường phát triển tài chính. Chỉ số tổng hợp này bao gồm 12 chỉ số thành phần, phản ánh tương đối đầy đủ các đặc tính của hệ thống tài chính, từ đó giúp đánh giá được toàn diện hơn mức độ phát triển tài chính của các quốc gia qua 3 khía cạnh: độ sâu tài chính, hiệu quả và độ ổn định. Do đó, sử dụng FDI trong nghiên cứu về mối quan hệ giữa phát triển tài chính và tăng trưởng kinh tế có thể giúp đưa ra những kết luận chính xác hơn do biến phát triển tài chính được đo lường tốt hơn.
Luận án đã xây dựng mô hình hồi quy số liệu mảng động, có xử lý vấn đề nội sinh của biến phát triển tài chính. Các kết quả nghiên cứu thực nghiệm đã khẳng định phát triển tài chính- dù được đo lường bằng phương pháp nào- đều có tác động tích cực đến tăng trưởng kinh tế ở các nước ASEAN+3. Kết luận này đã ủng hộ giả thuyết “Tài chính dẫn dắt tăng trưởng”, khẳng định phát triển tài chính góp phần thúc đẩy quá trình phân bổ vốn, điều này, như ngầm định bởi mô hình tăng trưởng nội sinh, dẫn đến tăng trưởng dài hạn cao hơn.
Luận án cũng kiểm nghiệm mối quan hệ phi tuyến giữa phát triển tài chính và tăng trưởng kinh tế, với kết quả hồi quy ủng hộ giả thuyết “quá nhiều tài chính” của Arcand và cộng sự (2015), tức là tăng trưởng bị tác động tiêu cực bởi sự phát triển quá mức của tài chính. Trong trường hợp các nước có nền tài chính rất phát triển như Nhật Bản, Singapore, hoặc trường hợp Trung Quốc trong những năm gần đây, quy mô của khu vực tài chính có thể quá lớn so với mức tối ưu, do đó tài chính phát triển quá mức có thể có tác động biên âm đến tăng trưởng kinh tế. Các nhà hoạch định chính sách ở các quốc gia này cần chú trọng tối ưu hóa độ sâu tài chính, củng cố và thúc đẩy chất lượng và hình thức của tài chính hơn là mở rộng khu vực này, đồng thời phát triển các chiến lược thúc đẩy tăng trưởng khác nếu ngưỡng phát triển tài chính tối ưu đã đạt được.
179 trang |
Chia sẻ: yenxoi77 | Lượt xem: 633 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Luận án Mối quan hệ giữa phát triển tài chính và tầng trưởng kinh tế ở các nước Asean+3 và những gợi ý chính sách cho Việt Nam, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Gov
-.0004798
-.0009844
.0005046
.0007099
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, efficient under Ho
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference in coefficients
not systematic
Chi2(6) -
(b-B)'[(V b-v
B) A(-1) ] (b-B)
=
20.29
Prob>chi2 =
0.0025
(V b-v B is
not positive definite)
Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model
HO: sigma(i)A2 = sigmaA2 for all 1
chi2 (9) = 228.86
Prob>chi2 = 0.0000
FDI tỉnh theo PCA
Fixed-effects (within) regression Group variable: NoCoun
R-sq: within = 0.7465
between = 0.0004
overall = 0.0808
Number of obs = 36
Number of groups = 9
Obs per group: min = 4
avg = 4.0
max = 4
F(6,21)
=
10.31
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.3302
Prob > F
=
0.0000
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
t
p> 111
[95% Conf.
Interval]
InYO
.0136045
.0082611
1.65
0.114
-.0035755
.0307844
FDIpca
-.1728251
.057836
-2.99
0.007
-.2931016
-.0525486
CAP
.2296326
.0347906
6.60
0.000
.1572816
.3019836
POPtb
-.0124643
.0039701
-3.14
0.005
-.0207206
-.004208
ECONFREE
.000249
.0006503
0.38
0.706
-.0011034
.0016015
Gov
-.0013392
.0011708
-1.14
0.266
-.003774
.0010957
_cons
-.0046036
.0758188
-0.06
0.952
-.1622775
.1530702
sigma_u
. 02490541
sigma_e
. 00740401
rho
.91879811
(fraction
of variance due to
u_i)
F test that all u_i=0:
Prob > F = 0.0000
. hausman fe re
Coefficients
(b)
fe
(B)
re
(b-B)
Difference
sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
S.E.
InYO
.0136045
-.0003958
.0140003
. 0060149
FDIpca
- .1728251
-.0353732
-.1374519
. 0320404
CAP
.2296326
.2370259
-.0073933
POPtb
- . 0124643
-.0095953
-.0028691
ECONFREE
.000249
-.0000995
.0003485
. 0003467
Gov
-.0013392
-.0009545
-.0003847
.000327
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, efficient under Ho
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference in coefficient
s not systematic
Chi2(6) =
(b-B)' (V_b-V
_B)A(-1) ] (b-B)
=
119.67
Prob>chi2 =
0.0000
(V_b-V_B is
not positive
definite)
Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model
HO: sigma(i)A2 = sigmaA2 for all i
Chi2 (9) =
Prob>chi2 =
400.57
0.0000
FDI tỉnh theo phương pháp DEA
Fixed-effects (within) regression
Group variable: NoCoun
R-sq: within = 0.ỔỔ8Ổ
between = 0.3775
overall = 0.4250
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.3811
Number of
Number of
obs =
groups =
36
9
Obs per group: min =
4
avg =
4.0
max =
4
F(6,21)
=
7.06
Prob > F
=
0.0003
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
t
p> 111
[95% Conf.
Interval]
InYO
-.0013869
. 0068478
-0.20
0.841
-. 0156277
.0128539
FDIdea
-.0334052
. 0242793
-1.38
0.183
-.0838967
.0170862
CAP
.1891374
. 0417529
4.53
0.000
.1023075
.2759672
POPtb
-.0093864
. 0044474
-2.11
0.047
-.0186354
-.0001375
ECONFREE
-.0006083
. 0006594
-0.92
0.367
- . 0019797
. 000763
Gov
-.0013931
. 0013581
-1.03
0.317
- . 0042174
.0014313
_cons
.1339551
. 0674563
1.99
0.060
-.006328
.2742382
sigma_u
.01938378
sigma_e
.00846571
rho
.83981133
(fraction
of variance due to
u_i)
F test that all u_i=o:
F(8, 21) =
Prob > F = 0.0008
. hausman fe re
Coefficients
(b)
fe
(B) re
(b-B)
Difference
sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
S.E.
InYO
-.0013869
-.0076046
.0062177
.0047203
FDldea
-.0334052
. 0470102
-.0804154
.0035042
CAP
.1891374
.3021454
-.1130081
POPtb
-.0093864
-.0090366
-.0003498
.0008664
ECONFREE
-.0006083
.0001015
-.0007098
. 000376
Gov
-.0013931
-.0012055
-.0001875
.0008199
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, efficient under Ho
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference i
n coefficient
s not systematic
Chi2(6) =
(b-B)' (V_b-V
_B) - (-1) ] (b-B)
=
145.54
Prob>chi2 =
0 0000
(V_b-V_B is
not positive
definite)
Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model
HO: sigma(i) A2 = sigmaA2 for all i
Chi2 (9) =
Prob>chi2 =
3791.88
0.0000
MÔ hình 3:
. xtreg gRGDPpc FDIpca CAP POP ECONFREE Gov TRADE INF, re
Random-effects GLS regression
Group variable: NoCoun
Number of obs
Number of groups
180
R-sq: within = 0.6495 between = 0.4646 overall = 0.5919
Obs per group: min =
20
avg = 20.0
max =
20
Wald Chi2(7)
Prob > chi2
311.71
0.0000
Chi2 (7)
Prob>chi2
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
-.0637871
.0301919
-2.11
0.035
-.1229621
-.0046121
CAP
.2552842
.0188801
13.52
0.000
.2182799
.2922886
POP
-.0203305
.0028751
-7.07
0.000
-.0259656
-.0146955
ECONFREE
.0001235
.0004569
0.27
0.787
-.000772
.0010189
Gov
-.0029581
.0010726
-2.76
0.006
-.0050604
-.0008558
TRADE
.0000776
.0000522
1.48
0.138
-.0000248
.0001799
INF
-.0009753
.0003639
-2.68
0.007
-.0016886
-.000262
_cons
.0970538
. 027417
3.54
0.000
.0433173
.1507902
sigma u
.01680742
sigma e
.01936933
rho
.42953699
(fraction
of variance due to
u_i)
corr(u_i, X) =0 (assumed)
Hausman test
. hausman fe re, sigmamore
Coefficients
(b)
fe
(B)
re
(b-B)
Difference
sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
S.E.
FDIpca
-.0878752
-.0637871
-.0240881
.0107322
CAP
.2570322
.2552842
.001748
.0021623
POP
-.0209049
-.0203305
-.0005743
.0005797
ECONFREE
.0004169
.0001235
.0002934
.000374
Gov
-.0038002
-.0029581
-.0008421
.0005715
TRADE
.0001335
.0000776
.0000559
.0000538
INF
-.001061
-.0009753
-.0000858
.0001221
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha,
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, eff
icient under Ho,
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference ir
1 coefficients
not systematic
(b-B) ' [ (V_b-V_B) A (-1) ] (b-B)
7.73
0.3569
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>| z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
-.0473466
. 0315231
-1.50
0.133
-.1091308
.0144376
CAP
.2529763
.0190613
13.27
0.000
.2156168
.2903359
POP
-.0200502
.0029181
-6.87
0.000
-.0257695
-.0143309
ECONFREE
.0000147
.0004562
0.03
0.974
-.0008794
.0009087
Gov
-.0027335
.0011587
-2.36
0.018
-.0050045
-.0004625
TRADE
.000087
.000054
1.61
0.107
-.0000188
.0001927
INF
-.0009801
.0003672
-2.67
0.008
-.0016999
-.0002603
_cons
.0919484
. 0277997
3.31
0.001
. 0374621
. 1464348
sigma_u
.01676583
sigma_e
.0195366
rho
.42411743
(fraction
of variance due to
u_i)
Random-effects GLS regression Group variable: NoCoun
R-sq: within = 0.6432 between = 0.5242 overall = 0.6062
Number
of
obs
=
180
Number
of
groups
=
9
corr(u_i, X) =0 (assumed)
Obs per group: min =
20
20.0
20
avg = max =
Wald chi2(7)
=
305.65
Prob > chi2
=
0.0000
. hausman fe re
Coefficients
(b-B)
Difference
sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
S.E.
(b)
f e
(B) re
FDIbq
- . 0745867
- . 0473466
- . 0272401
. 0144221
CAP
.2552664
.2529763
. 0022901
.0026051
POP
- . 0207687
-.0200502
-.0007185
. 0006265
ECONFREE
.000293
.0000147
. 0002784
.0003751
Gov
-.0033954
-.0027335
- . 0006619
. 0004999
TRADE
. 0001604
.000087
.0000734
.0000582
INF
-.0010697
-.0009801
-.0000896
. 0001209
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha,
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, eff
icient under Ho,
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference i
n coefficients
not systematic
Chi2(7) = (b-B)•[(V_b-V_B)A(-1)](b-B)
= 7.31
Prob>chi2 = 0.3971
F (7,83)
=
8.13
corr(u_i, Xb)
= -0.8385
Prob > F
=
0 . 0000
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
t
p> 111
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIdea
. 0162438
. 0376187
0.43
0.667
-.0585783
.091066
CAP
.2560063
. 040028
6.40
0.000
. 1763922
.3356203
POP
-.0301335
.0060249
-5.00
0.000
-.0421168
-.0181502
ECONFREE
. 0012598
.0014658
0.86
0.393
-.0016555
.0041752
Gov
-.0037742
.0034144
-1.11
0.272
-.0105654
.003017
TRADE
.000419
.000152
2.76
0.007
.0001167
.0007213
INF
.0010754
.0008332
1.29
0.200
-.0005818
.0027325
_cons
-.0471934
.0899012
-0.52
0.601
-.2260032
. 1316164
sigma_u
.05094901
sigma_e
.01972993
rho
.86959431
(fraction
of variance due to
u_i)
F test that all u i=0:
F(8, 83) =
4.96
Prob >
F = 0 . 0000
Fixed-effects (within) regression Group variable: NoCoun
R-sq: within = 0.4067
between = 0.0017
overall = 0.0169
Number of obs
Number of groups
Obs per group: min avg max
99
9
11
11.0
11
. hausman fe re
Coefficients
(b)
f e
(B) re
(b-B)
Difference
sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B) )
S.E.
FDIdea
.0162438
. Ũ4Ũ3Ũ53
-.0240615
.0246002
CAP
.2560063
.2884985
-.0324922
POP
-.0301335
-.0187755
-.011358
.0039002
ECONFREE
.0012598
-.0010776
.0023375
. 001363
Gov
-.0037742
-.0018848
-.0018894
.0030591
TRADE
. 000419
. ŨŨŨ1Ũ53
.ŨŨŨ3137
.0001405
INF
.0010754
. 0004423
.000633
b
= consistent
under Ho and Ha,
obtained from xtreg
B
= inconsistent
under Ha, eff
icient under Ho,
obtained from xtreg
Test: Ho
difference in
coefficients
not systematic
Chi2(7) =
Prob>chi2 =
(b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)A(-1)](b-B)
16.54
0.0206
(V_b-V_B is
not positive definite)
Phụ lục 7.2: Kết quả hồi quy mô hình 2 và Mô hình 3 sử dụng 2SLS
(bổ sung cho phần 4.4.2 tr. 99)
Mô hình 2
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Total (centered) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
.0136288499
.0548931963
.0039599637
Number of obs = F( 6, 20) = Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 =
27
9.07
0.0001
0.7094
0.9279
Root MSE = .01211
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>| z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.1486008
.0550597
2.70
0.007
.0406858
.2565157
LnYO
-.0113435
.0064293
-1.76
0.078
-.0239446
.0012576
POPtb
-.0090186
.0045859
-1.97
0.049
-.0180067
-.0000304
Gov
-.0021923
.0012049
-1.82
0.069
-.0045539
.0001694
ECONFREE
.0001415
.0005416
0.26
0.794
-.0009201
.001203
CAP
.3073111
.0757553
4.06
0.000
.1588334
.4557889
_cons
.0843138
.0276749
3.05
0.002
.0300721
.1385556
15.711
0.0004
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic):
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
10%
maximal
IV
sj
Lze
19.93
15%
maximal
IV
sj
Lze
11.59
20%
maximal
IV
sj
Lze
8.75
25%
maximal
IV
sj
Lze
7.25
13.222
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic) Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values:
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 8.823
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.0030
Instrumented: FDIpca
Included instruments: LnYO POPtb Gov ECONFREE CAP
Excluded instruments: L.FDIpca L.gRGDPpc
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs = 27 F( 6, 20) = 9.79 Prob > F = 0.0000
Total (centered) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
.0136288499
.0548931963
.0035425749
Centered R2 = 0.7401
Uncentered R2 = 0.9355
Root MSE
. 01145
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
.1002314
. 0433619
2.31
0.021
. 0152436
.1852191
LnYO
-.0100277
. 006201
-1.62
0.106
-.0221814
.0021261
POPtb
-.0110016
.0043312
-2.54
0.011
-.0194905
-.0025126
Gov
-.0022798
.0012181
-1.87
0.061
-.0046672
.0001077
ECONFREE
.0002309
.0005131
0.45
0.653
-.0007747
.0012365
CAP
.3516764
.0671086
5.24
0.000
.2201459
.4832068
_cons
.0905553
. 030094
3.01
0.003
.0315722
.1495385
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 21.170
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 34.500
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 12.734
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.0004
Instrumented: FDIbq
Included instruments: LnYO POPtb Gov ECONFREE CAP
Excluded instruments: L.FDIbq L.gRGDPpc
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
27
F( 6, 20) =
6.23
Prob > F =
0.0008
Total
(centered) ss
=
.0136288499
Centered R2 =
0.5350
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.0548931963
Uncentered R2 =
0.8845
Residual ss
=
.0063376684
Root MSE
.01532
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
E>> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIdea
.1765001
.0584573
3.02
0.003
.061926
.2910743
LnYO
-.0224699
.0096439
-2.33
0.020
-.0413716
-.0035682
POPtb
-.0118936
.0058018
-2.05
0.040
-.0232649
-.0005224
Gov
-.0026974
.0015101
-1.79
0.074
-.005657
.0002623
ECONFREE
.0004458
.0006915
0.64
0.519
-.0009096
.0018011
CAP
.3067562
.0905233
3.39
0.001
.1293339
.4841786
_cons
.0881776
.0326686
2.70
0.007
. 0241483
.1522069
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 10.435
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0054
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 5.985
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sarqan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 1.319
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.2507
MÔ hình 3:
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
171
F( 8, 162) =
42.38
Prob > F =
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6742
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8235
Residual ss
=
.0813087154
Root MSE
.02181
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.0866291
.039384
2.20
0.028
.0094378
.1638203
LnY
-.0113331
.0040435
-2.80
0.005
-.0192582
-.0034079
POP
-.0164161
.0027693
-5.93
0.000
-.0218439
-.0109884
Gov
-.0023276
.0010448
-2.23
0.026
-.0043753
-.0002799
ECONFREE
.0001752
.0004561
0.38
0.701
-.0007188
.0010692
CAP
.2560592
.0212071
12.07
0.000
.2144941
.2976243
TRADE
.0000462
.0000383
1.21
0.228
-.0000289
.0001213
INF
-.0010558
.0003931
-2.69
0.007
-.0018262
-.0002854
_cons
.1208631
.0163064
7.41
0.000
.0889031
.1528232
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 96.406
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 96.406
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 104.038
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sarqan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.044
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.8330
Instrumented: FDIpca
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIpca L.gRGDPpc
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIdea
.1346338
.0656625
2.05
0.040
.0059377
.2633298
LnY
-.0147679
.0118131
-1.25
0.211
-.0379211
.0083853
POP
-.0191112
.0045977
-4.16
0.000
-.0281225
-.0100999
Gov
-.0033612
.0017462
-1.92
0.054
-.0067837
.0000612
ECONFREE
.000269
.0011768
0.23
0.819
-.0020376
.0025756
CAP
.3080369
.0457582
6.73
0.000
.2183524
.3977213
TRADE
-3.40e-06
.0000782
-0.04
0.965
-.0001568
.00015
INF
.0010384
.000955
1.09
0.277
-.0008334
.0029102
_cons
.0825263
.027105
3.04
0.002
.0294015
.1356512
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Total (centered) ss = .2496021725 Total (uncentered) ss = .4605937668 Residual ss = .0797855647
Number of obs = 171 F( 8, 162) = 42.89 Prob > F = 0.0000 Centered R2 = 0.6803 Uncentered R2 = 0.8268 Root MSE = .0216
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
.0588779
.0380657
1.55
0.122
-.0157295
.1334853
LnY
-.0115701
.0047977
-2.41
0.016
-.0209734
-.0021668
POP
-.017295
.0026965
-6.41
0.000
-.02258
-.01201
Gov
-.0021462
.0011492
-1.87
0.062
-.0043986
.0001061
ECONFREE
.0002148
.000487
0.44
0.659
-.0007398
.0011694
CAP
.2612138
.0207579
12.58
0.000
.220529
.3018986
TRADE
.0000541
.00004
1.35
0.177
-.0000244
.0001326
INF
-.0010777
.0003911
-2.76
0.006
-.0018442
-.0003112
_cons
. 1311911
.0206766
6.34
0.000
.0906657
.1717166
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 134.861
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification
test (Craqq-Donald
Wald
F statistic)
300.407
Stock-Yogo weak ID
test critical values
■ i 10%
maximal
IV
s
ize
19.93
15%
maximal
IV
s
ize
11.59
20%
maximal
IV
s
ize
8.75
25%
maximal
IV
s
ize
7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo
(2005). Reproduced
by permission,
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.135
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.7130
Instrumented: FDIbq
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIbq L.gRGDPpc
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
90
F( 8, 81) =
11.82
Total (centered) ss = .095724225 Total (uncentered) ss = .226759094 Residual ss = .0456885156
Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 = Root MSE
0.0000
0.5227
0.7985
.02253
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 25.264
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 25.264
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 15.611
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005) . Reproduced by permission.
Sarqan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 2.375
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.1233
Instrumented:
FDIdea
Included instruments:
LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments:
L.FDIdea L.gRGDPpc
Phụ lục 7.3: Kết quả hồi quy mô hình 2 và Mô hình 3 sử dụng GMM
(bổ sung cho phần 4.4.2 tr. 99)
Mô hình 2:
2-Step GMM estimation
Number of obs = F( 8, 162) = Prob > F
Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 = Root MSE
171
35.99
0.0000
0.6739
0.8233
. 02182
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Total (centered) ss = .2496021725
Total (uncentered) ss = .4605937668
Residual ss = .0813953979
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.0885489
.0384097
2.31
0.021
.0132673
. 1638305
LnY
-.0114454
.0033671
-3.40
0.001
-.0180448
-.004846
POP
-.0163683
.0025871
-6.33
0.000
-.021439
-.0112976
Gov
-.0023209
.0010602
-2.19
0.029
-.0043988
-.0002429
ECONFREE
.0001687
.0004064
0.41
0.678
-.000628
. 0009653
CAP
.2561106
.0196803
13.01
0.000
.2175379
.2946833
TRADE
.0000458
.0000415
1.10
0.270
-.0000355
. 0001271
INF
-.0010548
.000559
-1.89
0.059
-.0021505
. 0000409
_cons
.1213088
.0165093
7.35
0.000
.0889512
. 1536664
Underidentification test
(Kleibergen-
-Paap rk
LM statistic):
47.101
Chi-sq(2) P-val =
0.0000
Weak identification test
(Cragg-Donald Wald F
statistic)
104.038
(Kleibergen-
-Paap rk
Wald F statistic):
81.697
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10%
maximal IV
size
19.93
15%
maximal IV
size
11.59
20%
maximal IV
size
8.75
25%
maximal IV
size
7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.021
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.8850
Instrumented: FDIpca
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF Excluded instruments: L.FDIpca L.gRGDPpc
2—Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number
F( 8,
Prob >
of obs 162)
F
171
37.50
0.0000
Total (centered) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
.2496021725
.4605937668 .0798045167
Centered R2 = 0.6803
Uncentered R2 = 0.8267
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
. 0579544
.0316913
1.83
0.067
- .0041595
.1200683
LnY
- . 0114609
.0036828
-3.11
0.002
- . 0186791
- .0042427
POP
- . 0173231
.0025542
-6.78
0.000
- . 0223292
- . 012317
Gov
- . 0021927
.0010969
-2.00
0.046
- .0043425
- .0000429
ECONFREE
. 0002302
.0004096
0.56
0.574
- .0005727
.0010331
CAP
.260957
. 0191972
13.59
0.000
.2233311
.2985829
TRADE
. 000054
.0000414
1.30
0.192
- .0000272
.0001352
INF
- . 0010857
.0004983
-2.18
0.029
- .0020624
-.000109
_cons
.1303397
.0199157
6.54
0.000
.0913057
.1693736
. 0216
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 55.373
Ch±-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 55.373
Ch±-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 300.407
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 286.755
Stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005) . Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg—Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.064
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.8010
Instrumented: FDIbq
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF Excluded instruments: L.FDIbq L.gRGDPpc
2-Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
90
F( 8, 81) =
6.78
Prob > F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
. 095724225
Centered R2 =
0.5311
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.226759094
Uncentered R2 =
0.8021
Residual ss
=
. 0448824325
Root MSE
.02233
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err
z
p>l z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDldea
.1071478
.0815517
1.31
0.189
-.0526906
.2669861
LnY
-.0109393
. 0127409
-0.86
0.391
-.035911
.0140325
POP
- . 0211445
. 0052127
-4.06
0.000
-.0313612
- . 0109278
Gov
-.0034767
.0016542
-2.10
0.036
-.0067189
-.0002346
ECONFREE
.0002135
.0011131
0.19
0.848
-.0019681
.0023951
CAP
.3183508
.0565857
5.63
0.000
.2074449
. 4292567
TRADE
.0000292
.0000757
0.39
0.700
-.0001192
.0001776
INF
.0008798
.001051
0.84
0.403
-.0011801
. 0029397
_cons
.0750359
.022217
3.38
0.001
.0314913
.1185804
Underidentification test
(Kleibergen-
Paap rk
LM statistic):
13.457
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
0.0012
Weak identification test
(Cragg-Donald Wald F
statistic)
15.611
(Kleibergen-
Paap rk
Wald F stat
istic):
7.029
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10%
maximal IV
size
19.93
15%
maximal IV
size
11.59
20%
maximal IV
size
8.75
25%
maximal IV
size
7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 1.182
Chi-sq(l) P-val = 0.2771
MÔ hình 3:
2—step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
27
F( 6, 20) =
5.96
Prob > F =
0.0011
Total
(centered) ss
=
.0136288499
Centered R2 =
0.7346
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
. 0548931963
Uncentered R2 =
0.9341
Residual ss
=
.0036166095
Root MSE =
.01157
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p>| z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
.1070761
.0406496
2.63
0.008
. 0274044
. 1867477
LnYO
-.010101
.0053229
-1.90
0.058
- . 0205338
.0003318
POPtb
-.0096335
.0044426
-2.17
0.030
- . 0183409
- .0009261
Gov
-.0021921
.0013318
-1.65
0.100
- . 0048024
.0004181
ECONFREE
.0000989
.0005914
0.17
0.867
- . 0010602
.0012581
CAP
.3556844
.0703202
5.06
0.000
.2178593
.4935095
_cons
.0936622
.0229016
4.09
0.000
. 0487759
. 1385486
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 8.565
Chi—sq(2) p-val = 0.0138
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic) : 34.500
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 57.322
Stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
11.148
0.0008
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): Chi—sq(l) p—val =
Instrumented: FDIbq
Included instruments: LnYO POPtb Gov ECONFREE CAP Excluded instruments: L.FDIbq L.gRGDPpc
2-Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
27
F( 6, 20) =
6.21
Prob > F =
0.0008
Total
(centered) ss
=
.0136288499
Centered R2 =
0.6293
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
. 0548931963
Uncentered R2 =
0.9080
Residual ss
=
.0050524811
Root MSE =
.01368
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p>| z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.2081449
.0574266
3.62
0.000
. 0955909
.3206989
LnYO
-.0161161
.0062776
-2.57
0.010
-.02842
- .0038122
POPtb
-.008451
.0041089
— 2.06
0.040
- . 0165043
-.0003977
Gov
-.0024217
.0012446
-1.95
0.052
- . 0048611
.0000176
ECONFREE
.0002515
.0005581
0.45
0.652
- . 0008424
.0013454
CAP
.2804354
.0745684
3.76
0.000
. 1342841
. 4265868
_cons
.0962332
.0211667
4.55
0.000
. 0547473
. 1377191
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 5.846
Ch±-sq(2) p-val = 0.0538
Weak Identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic) : 13.222
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 10.524
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 19.93
15% maximal IV size 11.59
20% maximal IV size 8.75
25% maximal IV size 7.25
NB: Critical values are for Craqq—Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Source: Stock-Yoqo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 7.847
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.0051
2—Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
Total (centered) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
.0136288499
. 0548931963
. 0073627171
F( 6, 20) = Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 =
27
8.08
0.0002
0.4598
0.8659
. 01651
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p>| z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIdea
.1954777
. 0363947
5.37
0.000
. 1241454
.2668099
LnYO
-.0218059
. 0087693
—2.49
0.013
-.0389934
- . 0046184
POPtb
- . 0100686
. 0046924
—2.15
0.032
-.0192656
-.0008717
Gov
-.0031544
. 0015442
—2.04
0.041
-.0061809
-.0001278
ECONFREE
. 0002456
.0006357
0.39
0.699
-.0010003
. 0014916
CAP
.3040604
. 0830431
3.66
0.000
. 1412989
.466822
_cons
. 082051
. 021838
3.76
0.000
. 0392493
. 1248526
Underidentification test (Kleibergen—Paap rk LM statistic): 6.170
Chi—sq(2) p—val = 0.0457
Weak identification test (Craqq—Donald Wald :
F statis
tic) :
5 .
985
(Kleibergen—Paap rk
Wald F
statistic):
12 .
384
Stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10%
maximal
IV size
19
. 93
15%
maximal
IV size
11
.59
20%
maximal
IV size
8
. 75
25%
maximal
IV size
7
.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005) . Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg—Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.865
Chi—sq(l) p—val = 0.3523
Instrumented: FDIdea
Included instruments: LnYO POPtb Gov ECONFREE CAP
Excluded instruments: L.FDIdea L.gRGDPpc
ivhettest 2SLS vs GMM (FDIpca)
. ivhettest, all
IV heteroskedasticity test(s) using levels of IVs only
Ho: Disturbance is homoskedastic
Pagan-Hall general test statistic : 13.212 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.1532
Pagan-Hall test w/assumed normality : 18.129 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.0337
White/Koenker nR2 test statistic : 15.485 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.0784
Breusch-Pagan/Godfrey/Cook-Weisberg : 25.028 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.0029
ivhettest 2SLS vs GMM (FDIbq)
. ivhettest, all
IV heteroskedasticity test(s) using levels of IVs only
Ho: Disturbance is homoskedastic
Pagan-Hall general test statistic : 11.529 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.2412
Pagan-Hall test w/assumed normality : 16.919 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.0500
White/Koenker nR2 test statistic : 12.408 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.1913
Breusch-Pagan/Godfrey/Cook-Weisberg : 20.823 Chi-sq(9) p-value = 0.0135
Phụ lục 7.4: Kết quả hồi quy mô hình 4 (2SLS và GMM)
(bổ sung cho phần 4.4.2 tr. 99)
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
171
F( 9, 161) =
35.57
Prob > F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6528
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8118
Residual ss
=
.0866704057
Root MSE
.02251
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.3824492
.1557718
2.46
0.014
.0771421
.6877563
FDIpca2
-.4165662
.2150997
-1.94
0.053
-.8381538
.0050214
LnY
-.0045404
.0055439
-0.82
0.413
-.0154063
.0063256
POP
-.0166504
.0028632
-5.82
0.000
-.0222621
-.0110387
Gov
-.0024009
.001078
-2.23
0.026
-.0045137
-.000288
ECONFREE
-.0002074
.0005141
-0.40
0.687
-.0012149
.0008001
CAP
.2589862
.0219671
11.79
0.000
.2159316
.3020408
TRADE
.0000452
.0000395
1.14
0.253
-.0000323
.0001227
INF
-.0009989
.000407
-2.45
0.014
-.0017965
-.0002012
_cons
.0419255
.0443789
0.94
0.345
-.0450555
.1289066
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 53.122
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 24.035
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.400
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.5273
Instrumented: FDIpca FDIpca2
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIpca2 L.FDIpca L.gRGDPpc
IV (SSLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
171
F( 9, 161) =
39.34
Total (centered) ss = .2496021725 Total (uncentered) ss = .4605937668 Residual ss = .0805627163
Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 = Root MSE =
0.0000
0.6772
0.8251
. 02171
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
.392075
. 0883475
4.44
0.000
.218917
.5652329
FDIbq2
-.5329996
. 1339425
-3.98
0.000
- .7955221
- . 2704772
LnY
.0039505
. 0064314
0.61
0.539
-.0086547
.0165558
POP
- .0164145
.0027167
-6.04
0.000
-.0217392
-.0110899
Gov
-.0017025
. 0011686
-1.46
0.145
-.0039929
.0005878
ECONFREE
-.0007981
. 0005628
-1.42
0.156
-.0019011
. 000305
CAP
.265779
. 0209102
12.71
0.000
.2247957
.3067623
TRADE
.0000658
. 0000405
1.62
0.104
-.0000136
.0001453
INF
-.0009122
.0003956
-2.31
0.021
-.0016876
-.0001368
_cons
.0144618
. 0371151
0.39
0.697
-.0582824
.0872061
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 103.556
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic): 103.556
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 81.890
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sarqan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.813
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.3672
Instrumented: FDIbq FDIbq2
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIbq2 L.FDIbq L.gRGDPpc
IV (2SLS) estimation
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number
F( 9,
Prob >
of obs 80)
F
90
11.56
0.0000
Total (centered) ss = .095724225 Total (uncentered) ss = .226759094 Residual ss = .0420270865
Centered R2 =
Uncentered R2 =
Root MSE =
0.5610
0.8147
. 02161
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDldea
. 8279677
. 7301479
1.13
0.257
-.6030958
2.259031
FDldea2
-.4482376
. 4764784
-0.94
0.347
-1.382118
. 4856429
LnY
-.0059988
. 0149426
-0.40
0.688
-.0352856
.0232881
POP
-.0178856
. 0046162
-3.87
0.000
-.0269333
-.0088379
Gov
-.0044499
. 0018911
— 2.35
0.019
- . 0081564
-.0007435
ECONFREE
.0001626
. 0010951
0.15
0.882
-.0019839
. 002309
CAP
.3063453
. 043796
6.99
0.000
.2205067
.3921839
TRADE
-.0000312
. 0000739
-0.42
0.673
-.0001759
.0001136
INF
.0011634
. 0009121
1.28
0.202
-.0006242
.0029511
_cons
- .2283304
.3318825
-0.69
0.491
-.8788082
. 4221473
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic) : 7.718
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0211
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic) : 7.718
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0211
Weak Identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic) : 2.470
Stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Sarqan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 1.782
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.1819
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIpca
.3877773
. 1400432
2.77
0.006
. 1132976
.662257
FDlpca2
- . 4201563
.1974649
— 2.13
0.033
- . 8071805
-.0331321
LnY
- . 0045681
.0051393
-0.89
0.374
- . 014641
. 0055048
POP
-.0165409
.0026605
-6.22
0.000
- . 0217554
-. 0113265
Gov
- .0023296
.0011012
— 2.12
0.034
- . 0044879
-. 0001713
ECONFREE
- . 00025
.0004768
-0.52
0.600
- . 0011845
. 0006844
CAP
.2600789
.0209842
12.39
0.000
.2189506
.3012072
TRADE
.0000464
. 0000434
1.07
0.284
- .0000386
. 0001315
INF
- .0010186
.0005994
-1.70
0.089
- .0021935
.0001563
_cons
. 0420272
. 0428054
0.98
0.326
- .0418698
. 1259241
Total (centered.) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
. 2496021725 .4605937668
. 0868881055
Number of obs = F( 9, 161) = Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 = Root MSE =
28.91 0.0000 0.6519 0.8114 . 02254
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 21.953
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak, identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 24.035
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 9.997
stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
NB: Critical values are for Cragg—Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Source: stock—Yogo (2005) . Reproduced by permission.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.141
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.7068
Instrumented: FDlpca FDlpca2
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDlpca2 L.FDlpca L.gRGDPpc
2—step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Total (centered) ss Total (uncentered) ss Residual ss
.2496021725
.4605937668
.0810248402
Number of obs = F( 9, 161) = Prob > F = Centered R2 = Uncentered R2 =
31.03 0.0000 0.6754 0.8241
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIbq
.3999731
.0875302
4.57
0.000
. 228417
. 5715292
FDIbq2
- .5486704
.1360358
— 4.03
0.000
-.8152957
- .2820451
LnY
.0046365
.0057564
0.81
0.421
-.0066458
.0159188
POP
- .0162738
.0026315
-6.18
0.000
-.0214314
-.0111161
Gov
-.001497
.0011116
-1.35
0.178
-.0036757
.0006817
ECONFREE
- .0009028
.0005062
-1.78
0.074
-.0018949
.0000892
CAP
.2669208
.0202989
13.15
0.000
.2271358
.3067058
TRADE
.0000698
.0000431
1.62
0.106
-.0000148
.0001544
INF
-.000921
.0005181
-1.78
0.075
-.0019366
.0000945
_cons
.011428
.0370355
0.31
0.758
-.0611602
.0840163
Root MSE = .02177
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 44.693
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 44.693
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.0000
Weak Identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 81.890
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 65.866
stock—Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.329
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.5663
2-Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
90
F( 9, 80) =
9.98
Prob > F =
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.095724225
Centered R2 =
0.5574
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.226759094
Uncentered R2 =
0.8132
Residual ss
=
.0423698685
Root MSE
.0217
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIdea
.8495531
.7565869
1.12
0.261
-.6333299
2.332436
FDldea2
-.4712867
.5068639
-0.93
0.352
-1.464722
.5221482
LnY
-.0031608
.0162181
-0.19
0.845
-.0349476
.028626
POP
-.0189803
.0060913
-3.12
0.002
-.0309189
-.0070416
Gov
-.0048017
.0014941
-3.21
0.001
-.0077301
-.0018733
ECONFREE
.0001592
.0009786
0.16
0.871
-.0017588
.0020772
CAP
.3037504
.0581919
5.22
0.000
.1896964
.4178043
TRADE
-.0000169
.0000647
-0.26
0.794
-.0001438
.00011
INF
.0010499
.0009676
1.08
0.278
-.0008466
.0029463
_cons
-.2502002
.3488873
-0.72
0.473
-.9340068
.4336064
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 4.362
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.1129
Underidentification test (Kleibergen-Paap rk LM statistic): 4.362
Chi-sq(2) p-val = 0.1129
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): 2.470
(Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic): 1.324
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values: 10% maximal IV size 13.43
15% maximal IV size 8.18
20% maximal IV size 6.40
25% maximal IV size 5.45
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.737
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.3907
Instrumented: FDIdea FDIdea2
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIdea2 L.FDIdea L.gRGDPpc
ivhettest 2SLS vs GMM (FDIpca)- MH bậc 2
. ivhettest, all
IV heteroskedasticity test(s) using levels of IVs only
Ho: Disturbance is homoskedastic
Pagan-Hall general test statistic : 13.699 Chi-sq(lQ) P-value = 0.1872
Pagan-Hall test w/assumed normality : 19.353 Chi-sq(lQ) p-value = Q.Q36Q
White/Koenker nR2 test statistic : 21.998 Chi-sq(lQ) P-value = Ũ.Q151
Breusch-Pagan/Godfrey/Cook-Weisberg : 38.232 Chi-sq(lQ) P-value = Q.QQQQ
ivhettest 2SLS vs GMM (FDIbq)- MH bậc 2
. ivhettest, all
IV heteroskedasticity test(s) using levels of IVs only
Ho: Disturbance is homoskedastic
Pagan-Hall general test statistic : 16.253 Chi-sq(lO) P-value = 0.0926
Pagan-Hall test w/assumed normality : 25.440 Chi-sq(lO) p-value = 0.0046
White/Koenker nR2 test statistic : 19.398 Chi-sq(lO) P-value = 0.0355
Breusch-Pagan/Godfrey/Cook-Weisberg : 35.763 Chi-sq(lũ) P-value = Ũ.ŨŨŨ1
Phụ lục 7.5: Kết quả hồi quy với các nhóm chỉ số thành phần
(bổ sung cho phần 4.4.2 tr. 99)
2-Step GMM estimation
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
171
F( 8, 162) =
34.61
Prob > F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
. 2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6643
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8181
Residual ss
=
.0837930196
Root MSE
.02214
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p> 1 z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIi
.0308459
.0216245
1.43
0.154
-.0115372
.0732291
LnY
-.0081058
.0027827
-2.91
0.004
-.0135598
-.0026518
POP
-.0171573
.0026456
-6.49
0.000
-.0223426
-.0119721
Gov
-.0017448
.0009839
-1.77
0.076
-.0036731
.0001836
ECONFREE
.0000352
.0003967
0.09
0.929
-.0007423
.0008127
CAP
.2699504
.0197149
13.69
0.000
.23131
.3085908
TRADE
.0000667
.0000382
1.75
0.081
-8.14e-06
.0001415
INF
-.0009938
.0005498
-1.81
0.071
-.0020715
.0000838
_cons
.112827
.0156671
7.20
0.000
.0821201
.143534
Underidentification test
(Kleibergen-
Paap rk LM
statistic):
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
51.140
0.0000
Weak identification
test
(Cragg-Donald
Wald :
F statistic)
131.
992
(Kleibergen-Paap rk
Wald F
statistic):
106.
620
Stock-Yogo weak ID
test critical values
: 10%
maximal
IV
size
19
. 93
15%
maximal
IV
size
11
.59
20%
maximal
IV
size
8
.75
25%
maximal
IV
size
7
.25
Source: Stock-Yogo
(2005)
. Reproduced
by permission
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
0.079
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments):
Chi-sq(l) p-val =
0.7788
Instrumented: FDIi
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIi L.gRGDPpc
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
171
F( 8, 162) =
43.98
Prob > F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6882
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8310
Residual ss
=
.0778200465
Root MSE
.02133
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIm
.0496773
.0313481
1.58
0.113
-.0117639
.1111185
LnY
-.0094563
.0038369
-2.46
0.014
-.0169766
-.001936
POP
-.0169792
.0026866
-6.32
0.000
-. 0222449
- .0117136
Gov
-.0013351
. 000843
-1.58
0.113
-. 0029874
.0003173
ECONFREE
.0000263
.0004365
0.06
0.952
-.0008292
.0008817
CAP
.2484065
.0232276
10.69
0.000
.2028813
.2939317
TRADE
.0000796
.0000326
2.45
0.014
.0000158
.0001434
INF
-.001123
.0003902
-2.88
0.004
-.0018877
-.0003583
_cons
.1191384
.0162801
7.32
0.000
. 0872299
.1510469
Underidentification test
(Anderson canon
. corr.
LM statistic):
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
92.718
0.0000
Weak identification test
(Cragg-Donald
Wald
F statistic)
95.345
Stock-Yogo weak ID test
critical values
: 10%
maximal
IV
size
19.93
15%
maximal
IV
size
11.59
20%
maximal
IV
size
8.75
25%
maximal
IV
size
7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
0.027
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments):
Chi-sq(l) p-val =
0.8693
Instrumented: FDIm
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIm L.gRGDPpc
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
171
F( 8, 162) =
35.10
Prob > F =
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6687
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8205
Residual ss
=
.0826899803
Root MSE
.02199
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDIibq
.0788915
. 0446974
1.77
0.078
-.0087139
.1664969
LnY
-.0089724
. 0028729
-3.12
0.002
-.0146031
-.0033417
POP
-.0170712
.0026005
-6.56
0.000
-.022168
-.0119743
Gov
-.0020526
.0010439
-1.97
0.049
-.0040985
-6.68e-06
ECONFREE
.0001094
.0003951
0.28
0.782
-.000665
.0008839
CAP
.2707726
.0197695
13.70
0.000
.2320252
.30952
TRADE
.0000598
.0000385
1.55
0.120
-.0000156
.0001352
INF
-.0010058
.0005297
-1.90
0.058
-.0020439
.0000324
_cons
.1173099
.016202
7.24
0.000
.0855545
.1490653
Underidentification test
(Kleibergen-
Paap rk LM
statistic):
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
63.066
0.0000
Weak identification test
(Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic): (Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F statistic):
463.541
654.238
Stock-Yogo weak ID test c
ritical values: 10% maximal IV size
19.93
15% maximal IV size
11.59
20% maximal IV size
8.75
25% maximal IV size
7.25
Source: Stock-Yogo (2005). Reproduced by permission.
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
0.092
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments):
Chi-sq(l) p-val =
0.7613
Instrumented: FDIibq
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDIibq L.gRGDPpc
Estimates efficient for arbitrary heteroskedasticity Statistics robust to heteroskedasticity
Number of obs =
171
F( 8, 162) =
38.55
Prob > F =
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2496021725
Centered R2 =
0.6781
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4605937668
Uncentered R2 =
0.8256
Residual ss
=
.0803492368
Root MSE
.02168
gRGDPpc
Coef.
Robust std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
FDImbq
.0304682
.0510383
0.60
0.551
-.069565
.1305015
LnY
-.007775
.0037013
-2.10
0.036
-.0150295
-.0005205
POP
-.0177141
.0026057
-6.80
0.000
-.0228211
-.0126071
Gov
-.0012134
.0009123
-1.33
0.183
-.0030015
.0005746
ECONFREE
-9.00e-06
. 0004065
-0.02
0.982
-.0008057
.0007877
CAP
.261427
. 0214619
12.18
0.000
. 2193624
.3034915
TRADE
.0000824
.0000383
2.15
0.032
7.27e-06
.0001576
INF
-.0010741
.000473
-2.27
0.023
-.0020011
-.000147
_cons
.1167859
.0203397
5.74
0.000
.0769208
.1566509
Underidentification test
(Kleibergen-
Paap rk LM
statistic):
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
48.823
0.0000
Weak identification
test
(Cragg-Donald
Wald :
F statistic)
155 .
728
(Kleibergen-Paap rk
Wald F
statistic):
123.
414
Stock-Yogo weak ID
test critical values
: 10%
maximal
IV
size
19
. 93
15%
maximal
IV
size
11
.59
20%
maximal
IV
size
8
. 75
25%
maximal
IV
size
7
.25
Source: Stock-Yogo
(2005)
. Reproduced
by permission
NB: Critical values are for Cragg-Donald F statistic and i.i.d. errors.
Hansen J statistic (overidentification test of all instruments): 0.163
Chi-sq(l) p-val = 0.6864
Instrumented: FDImbq
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.FDImbq L.gRGDPpc
Phụ lục 7.6: Kết quả hồi quy với các chỉ số tài chính đơn lẻ
(bổ sung cho phần 4.4.2 tr. 99)
IV (2SLS) estimation
Instrumented:
Included instruments:
Excluded instruments:
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Number of obs =
167
F( 10, 156) =
36.30
Prob > F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2483139065
Centered R2 =
0.7007
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
.4507615019
Uncentered R2 =
0.8351
Residual ss
=
.0743308296
Root MSE
. 0211
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>|z|
[95% Conf.
Interval]
LnM3
.0000376
. 0098375
0.00
0.997
-.0192435
.0193187
LnPricred
.0032795
. 0081249
0.40
0.686
-. 0126451
.019204
LnMkvalue
.0049556
. 0015083
3.29
0 .001
. 0019993
.0079119
LnY
-.0084123
. 0036348
-2.31
0 . 021
-.0155363
-.0012883
POP
-.0176148
.0027561
-6.39
0 .000
-.0230166
-.0122129
Gov
-.0026518
.0010754
-2.47
0 .014
-.0047596
-.0005441
ECONFREE
-.0002975
. 0005023
-0.59
0.554
-.0012819
.000687
CAP
.2536074
. 0218942
11.58
0 .000
.2106955
.2965192
TRADE
.0000716
. 0000404
1.77
0 . 077
-7.66e-06
.0001509
INF
-.0014498
. 0004029
-3.60
0 .000
-. 0022394
-.0006601
_cons
.1354143
. 0272981
4.96
0 .000
.081911
.1889177
Underidentification test
(Anderson canon, cor
r. LM statistic):
143.640
Chi
-sq(2) p-val =
0.0000
Weak identification test
(Cragg-Donald
Wald F
statistic)
238.276
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values
<not
available>
Sargan statistic (overidentification te
st of
all instruments):
0.003
Chi
-sq(l) p-val =
0.9534
LnM3 LnPricred LnMkvalue
LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
L.LnM3 L.LnPricred L.LnMkvalue L.gRGDPpc
Estimates efficient for homoskedasticity only Statistics consistent for homoskedasticity only
Chi-sq(2) p-val =
0.0000
Weak identification test (Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic):
Stock-Yogo weak ID test critical values:
238.276
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all instruments):
0.003
Chi-sq(l) p-val =
0.9534
Numbe
r of obs =
167
F( 10
, 156) =
36.30
Prob
> F
0.0000
Total
(centered) ss
=
.2483139065
Cente
red R2
0.7007
Total
(uncentered) ss
=
. 4507615019
Uncentered R2 =
0.8351
Residual ss
=
.0743308296
Root :
MSE
.0211
gRGDPpc
Coef.
std. Err.
z
p>| z 1
[95% Conf.
Interval]
LnM3
.0000376
.0098375
0.00
0.997
-.0192435
.0193187
LnPricred
.0032795
.0081249
0.40
0.686
-.0126451
.019204
LnMkvalue
.0049556
.0015083
3.29
0.001
.0019993
.0079119
LnY
-.0084123
.0036348
-2.31
0.021
-.0155363
-.0012883
POP
-.0176148
.0027561
-6.39
0.000
-.0230166
-.0122129
Gov
-.0026518
.0010754
-2.47
0.014
-.0047596
-.0005441
ECONFREE
-.0002975
.0005023
-0.59
0.554
-.0012819
.000687
CAP
.2536074
. 0218942
11.58
0.000
.2106955
.2965192
TRADE
.0000716
.0000404
1.77
0.077
-7.66e-06
.0001509
INF
-.0014498
.0004029
-3.60
0.000
-.0022394
-.0006601
_cons
. 1354143
. 0272981
4.96
0.000
.081911
.1889177
Underidentification test (Anderson canon, corr. LM statistic):
143.640
Instrumented: LnM3 LnPricred LnMkvalue
Included instruments: LnY POP Gov ECONFREE CAP TRADE INF
Excluded instruments: L.LnM3 L.LnPricred L.LnMkvalue L.gRGDPpc
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- luan_an_moi_quan_he_giua_phat_trien_tai_chinh_va_tang_truong.docx